Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs GNR
DMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs GNR
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$16.50
Change+$0.32 (+1.98%)
Volume$5.39K
Net Assets3.63M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$54.23
Change-$0.37 (-0.68%)
Volume$164.91K
Net Assets2.81B
DMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. GNR commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a StrongBuy and GNR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.81B vs. DMAT (3.63M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: DMAT (17.689) vs GNR (10.557). DMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: DMAT (3 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). DMAT has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| DMAT | GNR | DMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 17.689 | 10.557 | 168% |
| Net Assets | 3.63M | 2.81B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 15.00 | 149% |
| Yield | 1.00 | 4.44 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 14 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 77% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 73% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.59% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y