Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs GNR
DMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs GNR
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$24.60
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
Volume$9.1K
Net Assets10.39M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$59.86
Change-$0.52 (-0.86%)
Volume$200
Net Assets3.56B
DMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. GNR commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Hold and GNR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.56B vs. DMAT (10.4M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: DMAT (75.544) vs GNR (23.095). DMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: DMAT (4 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). DMAT has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| DMAT | GNR | DMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 75.544 | 23.095 | 327% |
| Net Assets | 10.4M | 3.56B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 15.00 | 149% |
| Yield | 0.93 | 3.61 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | -5.54% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.85% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | -5.74% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +7.69% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y