Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs GNR
DMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs GNR
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$33.31
Change+$7.90 (+31.09%)
Volume$28.86K
Net Assets41.9M
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Glb Ntrl Rs ETF
Price$70.27
Change+$11.30 (+19.16%)
Volume$482.64K
Net Assets4.31B
DMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. GNR commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Hold and GNR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 4.31B vs. DMAT (41.9M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: DMAT (19.920) vs GNR (13.083). DMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: DMAT (4 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). DMAT has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| DMAT | GNR | DMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 19.920 | 13.083 | 152% |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 4.31B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 46.71 | 15.00 | 311% |
| Yield | 0.55 | 2.50 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +5.21% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +8.61% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 19% Poorly correlated | +3.46% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +9.91% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y