Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs GNR
DMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs GNR
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$19.39
Change+$0.20 (+1.04%)
Volume$434
Net Assets4.39M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$55.37
Change-$0.36 (-0.65%)
Volume$100
Net Assets3.26B
DMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. GNR commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a StrongBuy and GNR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.26B vs. DMAT (4.39M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: DMAT (38.159) vs GNR (13.615). DMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: DMAT (4 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). DMAT has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| DMAT | GNR | DMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 38.159 | 13.615 | 280% |
| Net Assets | 4.39M | 3.26B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 15.00 | 149% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 3.90 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +2.68% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 62% Loosely correlated | +7.74% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.57% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| LTM - DMAT | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| HXL - DMAT | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| SHEL - GNR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| SLB - GNR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| RIO - GNR | 75% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| CNQ - GNR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| VALE - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||