Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs GNR
DMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs GNR
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$25.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
Volume$8.37K
Net Assets11.62M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$61.88
Change+$0.22 (+0.36%)
Volume$360
Net Assets3.7B
DMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. GNR commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a StrongBuy and GNR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.7B vs. DMAT (11.6M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: DMAT (82.008) vs GNR (25.704). DMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: DMAT (4 years) vs GNR (15 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). DMAT has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| DMAT | GNR | DMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 82.008 | 25.704 | 319% |
| Net Assets | 11.6M | 3.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.40 | 147% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 15.00 | 149% |
| Yield | 0.90 | 3.48 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 15 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +7.10% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y