Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAGX vs RPEBX
DMAGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts DMAGX vs RPEBX
Driehaus Global Fund
Price$19.08
Change+$0.09 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.85M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$72.20
Change+$0.37 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
DMAGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAGX is a StrongBuy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. DMAGX (76.8M). DMAGX pays higher dividends than RPEBX: DMAGX (0.43) vs RPEBX (0.12). DMAGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: DMAGX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than DMAGX (0.92). DMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. RPEBX (24.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DMAGX: RPEBX (250) vs DMAGX (10000). RPEBX (10.93) and DMAGX (10.45) have marching annual gain over last year. DMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.22 vs. RPEBX (22.10).
| DMAGX | RPEBX | DMAGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.21 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.452 | 18.652 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.8M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.12 | 374% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.45 | 10.93 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.27 | 42.44 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.22 | 22.10 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement