Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAGX vs FNWFX
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DMAGX vs FNWFX
Driehaus Global Fund
Price$18.76
Change-$0.40 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76M
American Funds New World F3
Price$97.61
Change-$1.26 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
DMAGX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAGX vs. FNWFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAGX is a StrongBuy and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. DMAGX (76M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than DMAGX: FNWFX (0.99) vs DMAGX (0.43). DMAGX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DMAGX (9 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). DMAGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). DMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). DMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DMAGX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.20 vs. DMAGX (11.92). DMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.07 vs. FNWFX (25.17).
| DMAGX | FNWFX | DMAGX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.57 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.57 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.488 | 26.733 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.99 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.92 | 21.20 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.39 | 49.23 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.07 | 25.17 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers