DLS | ISVL | DLS / ISVL | |
Gain YTD | 27.404 | 29.918 | 92% |
Net Assets | 1.03B | 39.3M | 2,618% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.30 | 193% |
Turnover | 41.00 | 63.00 | 65% |
Yield | 3.97 | 3.36 | 118% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 4 years | - |
DLS | ISVL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago85% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago78% | 18 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and ALM have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and ALM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ISVL | 100% | +0.23% | ||
ALM - ISVL | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.88% | ||
CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
SON - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
LAND - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
PETS - ISVL | 13% Poorly correlated | -4.52% | ||
More |