DLS | FYLD | DLS / FYLD | |
Gain YTD | 25.704 | 22.358 | 115% |
Net Assets | 1.03B | 421M | 244% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.59 | 98% |
Turnover | 41.00 | 44.00 | 93% |
Yield | 4.01 | 3.06 | 131% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
DLS | FYLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago85% | 5 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DLS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD | 100% | -0.41% | ||
WDS - FYLD | 70% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
SHEL - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
CVE - FYLD | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
RIO - FYLD | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
APAM - FYLD | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More |