Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLRHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLRHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. DLRHX (706M). DLRHX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLRHX (2.29) vs FSPHX (0.43). DLRHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLRHX (16 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). DLRHX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLRHX (5.00). DLRHX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DLRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. FSPHX (-2.82). DLRHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.68 vs. FSPHX (-18.71).
| DLRHX | FSPHX | DLRHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.63 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.901 | -3.306 | -88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 706M | 6.28B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.43 | 538% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | -2.82 | -263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.41 | -2.43 | -305% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.68 | -18.71 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.14 | 55.45 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers