Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLRHX vs FSPHX
DLRHX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLRHX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLRHX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. DLRHX (702M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLRHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs DLRHX (0.00). DLRHX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLRHX (16 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLRHX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLRHX (5.00). DLRHX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DLRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.18 vs. FSPHX (-3.95). DLRHX return over 5 years is better than : -3.68 vs. FSPHX (-11.15).
| DLRHX | FSPHX | DLRHX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.63 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.63 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.065 | 10.972 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 702M | 6.22B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.18 | -3.95 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.76 | 11.32 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.68 | -11.15 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.66 | 41.88 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers