Advertisement
DLPTF vs HLAGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLPTF is a Hold and HLAGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DLPTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLAGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DLPTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HLAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DLPTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLAGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DLPTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- HLAGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DLPTF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLAGF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.93%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (+3.18% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| DLPTF | HLAGF | DLPTF / HLAGF | |
| Capitalization | 4.46B | 25.9B | 17% |
| EBITDA | 1.68B | 5.17B | 32% |
| Gain YTD | -1.163 | -5.320 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.24 | 8.65 | 176% |
| Revenue | 10.7B | 19.9B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 5.88B | 7.73B | 76% |
| Total Debt | 12.7B | 6.46B | 197% |
DLPTF | HLAGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLAGF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as DLPTF (26). This means that HLAGF’s stock grew similarly to DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.
HLAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DLPTF (100). This means that HLAGF’s stock grew similarly to DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.
HLAGF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as DLPTF (87). This means that HLAGF’s stock grew similarly to DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.
DLPTF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as HLAGF (63). This means that DLPTF’s stock grew similarly to HLAGF’s over the last 12 months.
DLPTF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLAGF (97). This means that DLPTF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLAGF’s over the last 12 months.
| DLPTF | HLAGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 29% | 5 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 30% | 5 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLJH | 32.34 | 0.37 | +1.16% |
| Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | |||
| MARZ | 33.06 | 0.25 | +0.76% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome March ETF | |||
| SMMV | 42.50 | 0.24 | +0.57% |
| iShares MSCI USA Sm-Cp Min Vol Fctr ETF | |||
| DECM | 31.57 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Dec | |||
| IBDW | 20.89 | -0.05 | -0.21% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corp ETF | |||
DLPTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DLPTF and CICOY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLPTF and CICOY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DLPTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLPTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CICOY - DLPTF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CICOF - DLPTF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HLAGF - DLPTF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KAIKY - DLPTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HHULF - DLPTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HLAGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLAGF has been loosely correlated with MPZZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLAGF jumps, then MPZZF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLAGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLAGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MPZZF - HLAGF | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.23% | ||
| AMKBY - HLAGF | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
| MSLOF - HLAGF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMKBF - HLAGF | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
| HPGLY - HLAGF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||