DLPTF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.46B
HLAGF
Price
$147.23
Change
+$5.65 (+3.99%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
25.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DLPTF vs HLAGF

Header iconDLPTF vs HLAGF Comparison
Open Charts DLPTF vs HLAGFBanner chart's image
LIAONING PORT
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization4.46B
Hapag-Lloyd Aktien
Price$147.23
Change+$5.65 (+3.99%)
Volume$600
Capitalization25.88B
DLPTF vs HLAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DLPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DLPTF vs. HLAGF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLPTF is a Hold and HLAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DLPTF: $0.09 vs. HLAGF: $147.23)
Brand notoriety: DLPTF and HLAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DLPTF: 100% vs. HLAGF: 319%
Market capitalization -- DLPTF: $4.5B vs. HLAGF: $25.9B
DLPTF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $4.5B. HLAGF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $25.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DLPTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLAGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DLPTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DLPTF is a better buy in the long-term than HLAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DLPTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLAGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DLPTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HLAGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DLPTF is a better buy in the short-term than HLAGF.

Price Growth

DLPTF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLAGF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.18% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLAGF($25.9B) has a higher market cap than DLPTF($4.46B). DLPTF has higher P/E ratio than HLAGF: DLPTF (15.24) vs HLAGF (8.65). DLPTF YTD gains are higher at: -1.163 vs. HLAGF (-5.320). HLAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.17B vs. DLPTF (1.68B). HLAGF has more cash in the bank: 7.73B vs. DLPTF (5.88B). HLAGF has less debt than DLPTF: HLAGF (6.46B) vs DLPTF (12.7B). HLAGF has higher revenues than DLPTF: HLAGF (19.9B) vs DLPTF (10.7B).
DLPTFHLAGFDLPTF / HLAGF
Capitalization4.46B25.9B17%
EBITDA1.68B5.17B32%
Gain YTD-1.163-5.32022%
P/E Ratio15.248.65176%
Revenue10.7B19.9B54%
Total Cash5.88B7.73B76%
Total Debt12.7B6.46B197%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DLPTF vs HLAGF: Fundamental Ratings
DLPTF
HLAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8760
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLAGF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as DLPTF (26). This means that HLAGF’s stock grew similarly to DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.

HLAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DLPTF (100). This means that HLAGF’s stock grew similarly to DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.

HLAGF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as DLPTF (87). This means that HLAGF’s stock grew similarly to DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.

DLPTF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as HLAGF (63). This means that DLPTF’s stock grew similarly to HLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

DLPTF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLAGF (97). This means that DLPTF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DLPTFHLAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DLPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLJH32.340.37
+1.16%
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
MARZ33.060.25
+0.76%
TrueShares Structured Outcome March ETF
SMMV42.500.24
+0.57%
iShares MSCI USA Sm-Cp Min Vol Fctr ETF
DECM31.57N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Dec
IBDW20.89-0.05
-0.21%
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corp ETF

DLPTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DLPTF and CICOY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLPTF and CICOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLPTF
1D Price
Change %
DLPTF100%
N/A
CICOY - DLPTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOF - DLPTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLAGF - DLPTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAIKY - DLPTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHULF - DLPTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLAGF has been loosely correlated with MPZZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLAGF jumps, then MPZZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLAGF
1D Price
Change %
HLAGF100%
N/A
MPZZF - HLAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
AMKBY - HLAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
MSLOF - HLAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMKBF - HLAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
HPGLY - HLAGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More