DLMI
Price
$7.00
Change
+$0.45 (+6.87%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
GTWCF
Price
$0.96
Change
+$0.06 (+6.67%)
Updated
Dec 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DLMI vs GTWCF

Header iconDLMI vs GTWCF Comparison
Open Charts DLMI vs GTWCFBanner chart's image
Diamond Lake Minerals
Price$7.00
Change+$0.45 (+6.87%)
Volume$346
CapitalizationN/A
Greentown China Holdings
Price$0.96
Change+$0.06 (+6.67%)
Volume$10.56K
Capitalization2.89B
DLMI vs GTWCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DLMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DLMI vs. GTWCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLMI is a Hold and GTWCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DLMI: $7.00 vs. GTWCF: $0.96)
Brand notoriety: DLMI and GTWCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DLMI: 129% vs. GTWCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- DLMI: $0 vs. GTWCF: $2.89B
DLMI [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. GTWCF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DLMI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTWCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DLMI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTWCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DLMI is a better buy in the long-term than GTWCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DLMI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DLMI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

DLMI (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +7.69% price change this week, while GTWCF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.49% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DLMI YTD gains are higher at: 89.189 vs. GTWCF (0.000).
DLMIGTWCFDLMI / GTWCF
CapitalizationN/A2.89B-
EBITDAN/A15.5B-
Gain YTD89.1890.000-
P/E RatioN/A8.45-
RevenueN/A100B-
Total CashN/A68.5B-
Total DebtN/A128B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DLMI: Fundamental Ratings
DLMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DLMIGTWCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DLMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTASX38.860.64
+1.67%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
FSAEX13.400.13
+0.98%
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity
AICFX63.370.61
+0.97%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F1
SSRRX6.520.06
+0.93%
Touchstone Small Company R6
JACDX10.700.09
+0.85%
JHancock Global Environmental Opps R6

DLMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DLMI and KANP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLMI and KANP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLMI
1D Price
Change %
DLMI100%
N/A
KANP - DLMI
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVGPF - DLMI
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
BVERS - DLMI
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAG - DLMI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZLCZ - DLMI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GTWCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTWCF and NEN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTWCF and NEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTWCF
1D Price
Change %
GTWCF100%
N/A
NEN - GTWCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHVKY - GTWCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZLCZ - GTWCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLMI - GTWCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTAGY - GTWCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More