DLMAF
Price
$133.11
Change
-$1.88 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
36.94B
DQJCY
Price
$33.36
Change
-$0.26 (-0.77%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DLMAF vs DQJCY

Header iconDLMAF vs DQJCY Comparison
Open Charts DLMAF vs DQJCYBanner chart's image
Dollarama
Price$133.11
Change-$1.88 (-1.39%)
Volume$37.32K
Capitalization36.94B
Pan Pac
Price$33.36
Change-$0.26 (-0.77%)
Volume$19.25K
Capitalization19.95B
DLMAF vs DQJCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DLMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQJCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DLMAF vs. DQJCY commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLMAF is a Hold and DQJCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (DLMAF: $133.11 vs. DQJCY: $33.36)
Brand notoriety: DLMAF and DQJCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DLMAF: 197% vs. DQJCY: 78%
Market capitalization -- DLMAF: $36.94B vs. DQJCY: $19.95B
DLMAF [@Discount Stores] is valued at $36.94B. DQJCY’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $19.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $819.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $101.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DLMAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileDQJCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DLMAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • DQJCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DLMAF is a better buy in the long-term than DQJCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DLMAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DQJCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DLMAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DQJCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DLMAF is a better buy in the short-term than DQJCY.

Price Growth

DLMAF (@Discount Stores) experienced а -3.00% price change this week, while DQJCY (@Discount Stores) price change was -2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-1.26% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DLMAF($36.9B) has a higher market cap than DQJCY($20B). DLMAF has higher P/E ratio than DQJCY: DLMAF (40.82) vs DQJCY (32.65). DLMAF YTD gains are higher at: 37.952 vs. DQJCY (22.737). DQJCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 197B vs. DLMAF (2.28B). DQJCY has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. DLMAF (687M). DLMAF has less debt than DQJCY: DLMAF (5.56B) vs DQJCY (487B). DQJCY has higher revenues than DLMAF: DQJCY (2.18T) vs DLMAF (6.69B).
DLMAFDQJCYDLMAF / DQJCY
Capitalization36.9B20B185%
EBITDA2.28B197B1%
Gain YTD37.95222.737167%
P/E Ratio40.8232.65125%
Revenue6.69B2.18T0%
Total Cash687M203B0%
Total Debt5.56B487B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DLMAF vs DQJCY: Fundamental Ratings
DLMAF
DQJCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
559
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
249
SMR RATING
1..100
14100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3019
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DQJCY's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as DLMAF (93). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew similarly to DLMAF’s over the last 12 months.

DLMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DQJCY (49). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DLMAF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DQJCY (100). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew significantly faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DLMAF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DQJCY (54). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew similarly to DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DQJCY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as DLMAF (30). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew similarly to DLMAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DLMAFDQJCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DLMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQJCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YYGH0.390.01
+2.09%
YY Group Holding Limited
OKE73.671.07
+1.47%
Oneok
FMBH38.90-0.05
-0.13%
First Mid Bancshares
AVT52.84-0.17
-0.32%
Avnet
TNXP24.70-0.59
-2.33%
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp

DLMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DLMAF and BMRRY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLMAF and BMRRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLMAF
1D Price
Change %
DLMAF100%
-1.39%
BMRRY - DLMAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
WMMVY - DLMAF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
WMMVF - DLMAF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
DQJCY - DLMAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%

DQJCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQJCY and WMMVY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQJCY and WMMVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQJCY
1D Price
Change %
DQJCY100%
-0.77%
WMMVY - DQJCY
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
BMRRY - DQJCY
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
WMMVF - DQJCY
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
DLMAF - DQJCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%