Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. DLHCX (716M). DLHCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLHCX (1.90) vs FSPHX (0.43). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (16 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). DLHCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). DLHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. FSPHX (4.21). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -12.92 vs. DLHCX (-14.93).
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.63 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.63 | 319% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.379 | 0.774 | 307% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 716M | 6.36B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 0.43 | 446% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 4.21 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.26 | 1.83 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.93 | -12.92 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.13 | 54.06 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers