Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FSPHX
DLHCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. DLHCX (703M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than DLHCX: FSPHX (0.01) vs DLHCX (0.00). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHCX (16 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLHCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). DLHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.24 vs. FSPHX (-1.95). FSPHX (-7.43) and DLHCX (-7.79) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DLHCX | FSPHX | DLHCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.63 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.63 | 319% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.257 | 13.394 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 703M | 6.67B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.24 | -1.95 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.68 | 8.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.79 | -7.43 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.01 | 40.85 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement