Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLACX vs GFAFX
DLACX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts DLACX vs GFAFX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Y
Price$16.81
Change-$0.29 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.8M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
DLACX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLACX vs. GFAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLACX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. DLACX (165M). DLACX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: DLACX (0.50) vs GFAFX (0.28). DLACX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: DLACX (10 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). DLACX (0.80) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). DLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.80 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLACX: GFAFX (250) vs DLACX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. DLACX (-12.44). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. DLACX (-30.92).
| DLACX | GFAFX | DLACX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.67 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.996 | 19.672 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.28 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.44 | 8.83 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.45 | 64.95 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.92 | 40.08 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.46 | 102.20 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement