Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLACX vs GFAFX
DLACX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts DLACX vs GFAFX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Y
Price$16.54
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.81M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
DLACX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLACX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLACX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. DLACX (166M). DLACX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: DLACX (0.51) vs GFAFX (0.29). DLACX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: DLACX (10 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). DLACX (0.80) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). DLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.80 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLACX: GFAFX (250) vs DLACX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. DLACX (-12.55). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. DLACX (-31.14).
| DLACX | GFAFX | DLACX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.67 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.231 | 17.923 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.29 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.55 | 11.53 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.52 | 72.21 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.14 | 40.02 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.15 | 100.61 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement