DITHF
Price
$7.22
Change
-$0.29 (-3.86%)
Updated
Jan 29 closing price
Capitalization
5.48B
SW
Price
$53.19
Change
+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Updated
Feb 24, 11:54 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.32B
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DITHF vs SW

Header iconDITHF vs SW Comparison
Open Charts DITHF vs SWBanner chart's image
DS Smith
Price$7.22
Change-$0.29 (-3.86%)
Volume$300
Capitalization5.48B
Smurfit WestRock
Price$53.19
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization10.32B
DITHF vs SW Comparison Chart
Loading...
SW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DITHF vs. SW commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DITHF is a Hold and SW is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (DITHF: $7.22 vs. SW: $53.16)
Brand notoriety: DITHF and SW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DITHF: 29% vs. SW: 74%
Market capitalization -- DITHF: $5.48B vs. SW: $10.32B
DITHF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $5.48B. SW’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $10.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DITHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DITHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SW is a better buy in the long-term than DITHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

DITHF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SW (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

SW is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.92% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SW($10.3B) has a higher market cap than DITHF($5.48B). SW has higher P/E ratio than DITHF: SW (10.20) vs DITHF (8.61). SW YTD gains are higher at: -0.515 vs. DITHF (-1.277). SW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. DITHF (1.15B). SW (482M) and DITHF (472M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . DITHF has less debt than SW: DITHF (2.14B) vs SW (3.8B). SW has higher revenues than DITHF: SW (11.8B) vs DITHF (8.22B).
DITHFSWDITHF / SW
Capitalization5.48B10.3B53%
EBITDA1.15B1.99B58%
Gain YTD-1.277-0.515248%
P/E Ratio8.6110.2084%
Revenue8.22B11.8B70%
Total Cash472M482M98%
Total Debt2.14B3.8B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DITHF vs SW: Fundamental Ratings
DITHF
SW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3812
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4654
SMR RATING
1..100
9589
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SW's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DITHF (88). This means that SW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DITHF’s over the last 12 months.

DITHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (54). This means that DITHF’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

SW's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as DITHF (95). This means that SW’s stock grew similarly to DITHF’s over the last 12 months.

DITHF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (49). This means that DITHF’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

SW's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as DITHF (4). This means that SW’s stock grew similarly to DITHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

DITHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DITHF and SW have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DITHF and SW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DITHF
1D Price
Change %
DITHF100%
N/A
SW - DITHF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
MGIH - DITHF
7%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
AMCCF - DITHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTVE - DITHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
GRVWF - DITHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SW has been loosely correlated with IP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SW jumps, then IP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SW
1D Price
Change %
SW100%
-1.74%
IP - SW
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
PKG - SW
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
BERY - SW
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
GEF - SW
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
CCK - SW
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
More