Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DISCX vs RERBX
DISCX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts DISCX vs RERBX
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund C
Price$23.24
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.8B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.31
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.06B
DISCX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DISCX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DISCX is a StrongBuy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. DISCX (4.8B). RERBX pays higher dividends than DISCX: RERBX (0.24) vs DISCX (0.00). DISCX was incepted earlier than RERBX: DISCX (19 years) vs RERBX (23 years). DISCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. DISCX (12.30). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DISCX: RERBX (250) vs DISCX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.91 vs. DISCX (-3.70). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.57 vs. DISCX (4.44).
| DISCX | RERBX | DISCX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.56 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.56 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.588 | 20.570 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.8B | 137B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.70 | 9.91 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.79 | 45.47 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.44 | 9.57 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.39 | 35.83 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement