Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DISCX vs RERBX
DISCX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts DISCX vs RERBX
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund C
Price$23.16
Change-$0.35 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.43B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$55.57
Change-$0.76 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
DISCX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DISCX vs. RERBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DISCX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. DISCX (5.43B). RERBX pays higher dividends than DISCX: RERBX (0.45) vs DISCX (0.00). DISCX was incepted earlier than RERBX: DISCX (18 years) vs RERBX (23 years). DISCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. DISCX (12.30). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DISCX: RERBX (250) vs DISCX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.46 vs. DISCX (-4.58). DISCX (14.86) and RERBX (14.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DISCX | RERBX | DISCX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.56 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.56 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.225 | 9.282 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.43B | 133B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.58 | 2.46 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 23.03 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.86 | 14.43 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.25 | 16.06 | 338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement