DIN
Price
$34.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
104 days until earnings call
YUMC
Price
$47.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DIN vs YUMC

Header iconDIN vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$34.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$547.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Yum China Holdings
Price$47.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.92M
CapitalizationN/A
DIN vs YUMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. YUMC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a StrongBuy and YUMC is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (DIN: $34.86 vs. YUMC: $47.51)
Brand notoriety: DIN: Not notable vs. YUMC: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 80% vs. YUMC: 49%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $531.49M vs. YUMC: $18.04B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $531.49M. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $18.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than YUMC.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was -4.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.26% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($18B) has a higher market cap than DIN($531M). YUMC has higher P/E ratio than DIN: YUMC (20.93) vs DIN (5.80). YUMC YTD gains are higher at: 13.442 vs. DIN (-26.828). DIN has less debt than YUMC: DIN (1.59B) vs YUMC (2.48B).
DINYUMCDIN / YUMC
Capitalization531M18B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-26.82813.442-200%
P/E Ratio5.8020.9328%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.59B2.48B64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7314
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10080
SMR RATING
1..100
10062
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9181
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (34). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's SMR Rating (62) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (56). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (91). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+3.38%
CAKE - DIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
BLMN - DIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
DRI - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
-0.79%
YUM - YUMC
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
ARCO - YUMC
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
QSR - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
LKNCY - YUMC
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
DIN - YUMC
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
More