DIN
Price
$34.04
Change
+$0.19 (+0.56%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
490.98M
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YUMC
Price
$47.62
Change
+$0.68 (+1.45%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
16.94B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs YUMC

Header iconDIN vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$34.04
Change+$0.19 (+0.56%)
Volume$545.21K
Capitalization490.98M
Yum China Holdings
Price$47.62
Change+$0.68 (+1.45%)
Volume$1.17M
Capitalization16.94B
DIN vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. YUMC commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a StrongBuy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $34.04 vs. YUMC: $47.62)
Brand notoriety: DIN: Not notable vs. YUMC: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 109% vs. YUMC: 83%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $490.98M vs. YUMC: $16.94B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $490.98M. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $16.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than YUMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than YUMC.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.48% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.66% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($16.9B) has a higher market cap than DIN($491M). YUMC has higher P/E ratio than DIN: YUMC (19.76) vs DIN (15.20). DIN YTD gains are higher at: 20.211 vs. YUMC (0.424). YUMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. DIN (178M). DIN has less debt than YUMC: DIN (1.64B) vs YUMC (2.23B). YUMC has higher revenues than DIN: YUMC (11.4B) vs DIN (845M).
DINYUMCDIN / YUMC
Capitalization491M16.9B3%
EBITDA178M1.73B10%
Gain YTD20.2110.4244,764%
P/E Ratio15.2019.7677%
Revenue845M11.4B7%
Total CashN/A2.16B-
Total Debt1.64B2.23B74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1173
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
559
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (32). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's SMR Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (53). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (59). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYWCX43.150.55
+1.29%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth C
PRNIX30.900.23
+0.75%
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Inst
PDIAX22.520.10
+0.45%
Virtus KAR Equity Income A
SLRYX52.110.13
+0.25%
SEI Large Cap Growth Y (SIMT)
FCDAX42.44N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp A

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been closely correlated with CBRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then CBRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+0.56%
CBRL - DIN
70%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
BJRI - DIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
CAKE - DIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
DENN - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
+1.45%
YUM - YUMC
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.94%
DPZ - YUMC
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
FRSH - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
HDL - YUMC
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
SBUX - YUMC
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More