DIN
Price
$24.42
Change
-$0.77 (-3.06%)
Updated
Sep 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
387.41M
34 days until earnings call
RRGB
Price
$6.70
Change
-$0.25 (-3.60%)
Updated
Sep 25, 03:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
124.47M
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs RRGB

Header iconDIN vs RRGB Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs RRGBBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$24.42
Change-$0.77 (-3.06%)
Volume$12.19K
Capitalization387.41M
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
Price$6.70
Change-$0.25 (-3.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization124.47M
DIN vs RRGB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. RRGB commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and RRGB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $25.19 vs. RRGB: $6.95)
Brand notoriety: DIN and RRGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 123% vs. RRGB: 75%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $387.41M vs. RRGB: $124.47M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $387.41M. RRGB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $124.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRRGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RRGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than RRGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRGB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RRGB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RRGB is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +5.66% price change this week, while RRGB (@Restaurants) price change was +2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RRGB is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIN($387M) has a higher market cap than RRGB($124M). RRGB YTD gains are higher at: 26.594 vs. DIN (-11.042). RRGB has less debt than DIN: RRGB (523M) vs DIN (1.64B).
DINRRGBDIN / RRGB
Capitalization387M124M312%
EBITDAN/A26.1M-
Gain YTD-11.04226.594-42%
P/E Ratio8.42N/A-
RevenueN/A1.24B-
Total CashN/A24.4M-
Total Debt1.64B523M314%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs RRGB: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
RRGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1674
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1296
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (83). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RRGB (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's SMR Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RRGB (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

RRGB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (54). This means that RRGB’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (96). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINRRGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMRPF3.47N/A
N/A
B&M European Value Retail SA
KHTRF4.42N/A
N/A
Knight Therapeutics Inc
THURF0.04N/A
N/A
Thunderstruck Resources Ltd
KICK3.51N/A
N/A
HPN Holdings, Inc.
SONVY57.77-0.50
-0.86%
Sonova Holding AG

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+2.86%
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.94%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
CAKE - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
DRI - DIN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More

RRGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRGB has been loosely correlated with RICK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RRGB jumps, then RICK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRGB
1D Price
Change %
RRGB100%
-1.56%
RICK - RRGB
36%
Loosely correlated
+9.18%
YUM - RRGB
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
WEN - RRGB
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
LOCO - RRGB
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
DIN - RRGB
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
More