DIN
Price
$25.76
Change
-$0.79 (-2.98%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
392.75M
10 days until earnings call
RICK
Price
$52.07
Change
-$1.50 (-2.80%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
461.7M
78 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DIN vs RICK

Header iconDIN vs RICK Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs RICKBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$25.76
Change-$0.79 (-2.98%)
Volume$584.48K
Capitalization392.75M
RCI Hospitality Holdings
Price$52.07
Change-$1.50 (-2.80%)
Volume$44.85K
Capitalization461.7M
DIN vs RICK Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. RICK commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and RICK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $27.53 vs. RICK: $54.06)
Brand notoriety: DIN and RICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 100% vs. RICK: 127%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $392.75M vs. RICK: $461.7M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $392.75M. RICK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $461.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $218.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRICK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RICK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RICK is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RICK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RICK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DIN and RICK are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while RICK (@Restaurants) price change was +5.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

RICK is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.35% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RICK($462M) has a higher market cap than DIN($393M). RICK has higher P/E ratio than DIN: RICK (91.35) vs DIN (4.29). RICK YTD gains are higher at: -5.934 vs. DIN (-8.538). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 219M vs. RICK (34.7M). DIN has more cash in the bank: 170M vs. RICK (32.4M). RICK has less debt than DIN: RICK (272M) vs DIN (1.59B). DIN has higher revenues than RICK: DIN (814M) vs RICK (296M).
DINRICKDIN / RICK
Capitalization393M462M85%
EBITDA219M34.7M631%
Gain YTD-8.538-5.934144%
P/E Ratio4.2991.355%
Revenue814M296M275%
Total Cash170M32.4M525%
Total Debt1.59B272M583%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs RICK: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
RICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5364
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
10089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (6) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RICK (81) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's SMR Rating (89) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as DIN (63) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (95) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINRICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+6.01%
BLMN - DIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+9.73%
CAKE - DIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+4.57%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+8.23%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
DRI - DIN
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.82%
More

RICK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RICK has been loosely correlated with JACK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RICK jumps, then JACK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RICK
1D Price
Change %
RICK100%
+3.66%
JACK - RICK
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
DIN - RICK
40%
Loosely correlated
+6.01%
CAKE - RICK
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.57%
WEN - RICK
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.83%
PBPB - RICK
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.28%
More