DIN
Price
$29.63
Change
-$1.29 (-4.17%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
70 days until earnings call
PZZA
Price
$40.43
Change
-$1.53 (-3.65%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DIN vs PZZA

Header iconDIN vs PZZA Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs PZZABanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$29.63
Change-$1.29 (-4.17%)
Volume$4.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Papa John's International
Price$40.43
Change-$1.53 (-3.65%)
Volume$26.1K
CapitalizationN/A
DIN vs PZZA Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. PZZA commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and PZZA is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (DIN: $30.92 vs. PZZA: $41.96)
Brand notoriety: DIN and PZZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 106% vs. PZZA: 85%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $452.52M vs. PZZA: $1.32B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $452.52M. PZZA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePZZA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PZZA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZZA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PZZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -4.83% price change this week, while PZZA (@Restaurants) price change was -12.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

PZZA is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-4.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PZZA($1.32B) has a higher market cap than DIN($471M). PZZA has higher P/E ratio than DIN: PZZA (13.99) vs DIN (5.14). DIN YTD gains are higher at: -35.098 vs. PZZA (-43.002). PZZA has less debt than DIN: PZZA (961M) vs DIN (1.59B).
DINPZZADIN / PZZA
Capitalization471M1.32B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-35.098-43.00282%
P/E Ratio5.1413.9937%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.59B961M165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs PZZA: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
PZZA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5561
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1007
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6382
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (7) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (10). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's SMR Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that PZZA’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (82). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (96). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINPZZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
-1.62%
CAKE - DIN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
BLMN - DIN
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
DRI - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
More

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with DRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then DRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
-0.90%
DRI - PZZA
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
DIN - PZZA
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
JACK - PZZA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
DPZ - PZZA
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
RICK - PZZA
34%
Loosely correlated
+11.34%
More