DIN
Price
$25.76
Change
-$0.79 (-2.98%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
392.75M
10 days until earnings call
PZZA
Price
$47.72
Change
-$0.74 (-1.53%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DIN vs PZZA

Header iconDIN vs PZZA Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs PZZABanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$25.76
Change-$0.79 (-2.98%)
Volume$584.48K
Capitalization392.75M
Papa John's International
Price$47.72
Change-$0.74 (-1.53%)
Volume$1.38M
Capitalization1.56B
DIN vs PZZA Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. PZZA commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and PZZA is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $27.53 vs. PZZA: $51.08)
Brand notoriety: DIN and PZZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 100% vs. PZZA: 110%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $392.75M vs. PZZA: $1.56B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $392.75M. PZZA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $218.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePZZA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PZZA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZZA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PZZA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while PZZA (@Restaurants) price change was +22.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

PZZA is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.35% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PZZA($1.56B) has a higher market cap than DIN($393M). PZZA has higher P/E ratio than DIN: PZZA (16.51) vs DIN (4.29). PZZA YTD gains are higher at: 25.895 vs. DIN (-8.538). PZZA has less debt than DIN: PZZA (960M) vs DIN (1.59B).
DINPZZADIN / PZZA
Capitalization393M1.56B25%
EBITDA219MN/A-
Gain YTD-8.53825.895-33%
P/E Ratio4.2916.5126%
Revenue814MN/A-
Total Cash170MN/A-
Total Debt1.59B960M165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs PZZA: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
PZZA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5321
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1007
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9592
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (6) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (12). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's SMR Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that PZZA’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (63). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (95). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINPZZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
70%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+6.01%
BLMN - DIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+9.73%
CAKE - DIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+4.57%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+8.23%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
DRI - DIN
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.82%
More

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
+4.16%
DIN - PZZA
35%
Loosely correlated
+6.01%
JACK - PZZA
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
DPZ - PZZA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
BH - PZZA
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
CAKE - PZZA
33%
Poorly correlated
+4.57%
More