DIN
Price
$20.23
Change
+$0.51 (+2.59%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
316.32M
10 days until earnings call
PZZA
Price
$31.16
Change
+$0.12 (+0.39%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DIN vs PZZA

Header iconDIN vs PZZA Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs PZZABanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$20.23
Change+$0.51 (+2.59%)
Volume$413.68K
Capitalization316.32M
Papa John's International
Price$31.16
Change+$0.12 (+0.39%)
Volume$805.81K
Capitalization1.02B
DIN vs PZZA Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. PZZA commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and PZZA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $20.23 vs. PZZA: $31.16)
Brand notoriety: DIN and PZZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 61% vs. PZZA: 49%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $316.32M vs. PZZA: $1.02B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $316.32M. PZZA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePZZA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PZZA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZZA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PZZA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DIN and PZZA are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.44% price change this week, while PZZA (@Restaurants) price change was -3.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

PZZA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.71% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PZZA($1.02B) has a higher market cap than DIN($316M). PZZA has higher P/E ratio than DIN: PZZA (12.27) vs DIN (4.79). PZZA YTD gains are higher at: -23.201 vs. DIN (-31.386). PZZA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 226M vs. DIN (201M). DIN has more cash in the bank: 187M vs. PZZA (38M). PZZA has less debt than DIN: PZZA (971M) vs DIN (1.63B). PZZA has higher revenues than DIN: PZZA (2.06B) vs DIN (812M).
DINPZZADIN / PZZA
Capitalization316M1.02B31%
EBITDA201M226M89%
Gain YTD-31.386-23.201135%
P/E Ratio4.7912.2739%
Revenue812M2.06B39%
Total Cash187M38M492%
Total Debt1.63B971M167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs PZZA: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
PZZA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5758
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1007
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8790
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8094
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (3) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (8). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's SMR Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that PZZA’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (87) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (90). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (94). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINPZZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+2.59%
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.86%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+5.07%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
CAKE - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
DRI - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with WEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then WEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
+0.39%
WEN - PZZA
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
DIN - PZZA
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
QSR - PZZA
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
YUM - PZZA
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
PTLO - PZZA
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
More