DIN
Price
$23.68
Change
+$0.38 (+1.63%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
364.18M
53 days until earnings call
PZZA
Price
$48.24
Change
+$0.87 (+1.84%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs PZZA

Header iconDIN vs PZZA Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs PZZABanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$23.68
Change+$0.38 (+1.63%)
Volume$555.42K
Capitalization364.18M
Papa John's International
Price$48.24
Change+$0.87 (+1.84%)
Volume$752.9K
Capitalization1.58B
DIN vs PZZA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. PZZA commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and PZZA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $23.68 vs. PZZA: $48.24)
Brand notoriety: DIN and PZZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 119% vs. PZZA: 74%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $364.18M vs. PZZA: $1.58B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $364.18M. PZZA’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePZZA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PZZA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZZA’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PZZA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PZZA is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.13% price change this week, while PZZA (@Restaurants) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

PZZA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PZZA($1.58B) has a higher market cap than DIN($364M). PZZA has higher P/E ratio than DIN: PZZA (21.16) vs DIN (7.92). PZZA YTD gains are higher at: 21.441 vs. DIN (-18.126). PZZA has less debt than DIN: PZZA (984M) vs DIN (1.64B).
DINPZZADIN / PZZA
Capitalization364M1.58B23%
EBITDA178MN/A-
Gain YTD-18.12621.441-85%
P/E Ratio7.9221.1637%
Revenue845MN/A-
Total Cash194MN/A-
Total Debt1.64B984M167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs PZZA: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
PZZA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1460
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (14). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as PZZA (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's SMR Rating (6) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that PZZA’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

PZZA's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (60). This means that PZZA’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PZZA (60). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PZZA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINPZZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PZZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QMCI0.16N/A
N/A
QuoteMedia, Inc.
WWNTY35.00N/A
N/A
Want Want China Holdings Ltd
YUMSF1.12N/A
N/A
Demae Can Co Ltd.
BNZIF0.49N/A
N/A
BANCO INVEX S A INSTITUCION DE BANCA MULTIPLE INVEX GRUPO FINANCIERO
PNGAY14.16-0.06
-0.42%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China Ltd.

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+1.63%
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.16%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
CAKE - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
DRI - DIN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
More

PZZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZZA has been loosely correlated with WEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZZA jumps, then WEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PZZA
1D Price
Change %
PZZA100%
+1.84%
WEN - PZZA
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
DIN - PZZA
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
PBPB - PZZA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
BJRI - PZZA
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
DPZ - PZZA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More