DIN
Price
$28.57
Change
+$0.65 (+2.33%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
429.54M
13 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PBPB
Price
$17.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
517.66M
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs PBPB

Header iconDIN vs PBPB Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs PBPBBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$28.57
Change+$0.65 (+2.33%)
Volume$150
Capitalization429.54M
Potbelly
Price$17.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$380.21K
Capitalization517.66M
DIN vs PBPB Comparison Chart in %
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. PBPB commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and PBPB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $27.93 vs. PBPB: $17.11)
Brand notoriety: DIN and PBPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 78% vs. PBPB: 36%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $429.54M vs. PBPB: $517.66M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $429.54M. PBPB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $517.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBPB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBPB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBPB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBPB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than PBPB.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.02% price change this week, while PBPB (@Restaurants) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

PBPB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.62% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBPB($518M) has a higher market cap than DIN($430M). PBPB has higher P/E ratio than DIN: PBPB (48.89) vs DIN (9.34). PBPB YTD gains are higher at: 81.529 vs. DIN (-1.366). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 178M vs. PBPB (25M). PBPB has less debt than DIN: PBPB (148M) vs DIN (1.64B). DIN has higher revenues than PBPB: DIN (845M) vs PBPB (469M).
DINPBPBDIN / PBPB
Capitalization430M518M83%
EBITDA178M25M712%
Gain YTD-1.36681.529-2%
P/E Ratio9.3448.8919%
Revenue845M469M180%
Total CashN/A16.2M-
Total Debt1.64B148M1,108%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs PBPB: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
PBPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
10046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5028

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (5) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBPB (88). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that PBPB’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's SMR Rating (46) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that PBPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (45). This means that PBPB’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (9). This means that PBPB’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINPBPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALIZF434.4219.25
+4.64%
Allianz SE
PIFYF0.48N/A
+0.62%
Pine Cliff Energy Ltd.
SMNUF0.04N/A
N/A
Pt Sarana Menara Nusantara, Tbk
SEOFF11.05N/A
N/A
Stora Enso Oyj
SCIA4.18-0.06
-1.33%
SCI Engineered Materials, Inc.

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been closely correlated with CBRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then CBRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+6.24%
CBRL - DIN
70%
Closely correlated
+2.66%
BLMN - DIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+5.92%
BJRI - DIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
CAKE - DIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
DENN - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
More

PBPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBPB has been loosely correlated with PZZA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBPB jumps, then PZZA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBPB
1D Price
Change %
PBPB100%
-0.03%
PZZA - PBPB
34%
Loosely correlated
+6.71%
BROS - PBPB
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
DIN - PBPB
30%
Poorly correlated
+6.24%
CAVA - PBPB
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
TXRH - PBPB
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
More