DIN
Price
$24.57
Change
-$1.20 (-4.66%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
383.93M
32 days until earnings call
PBPB
Price
$12.31
Change
+$0.45 (+3.79%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
371.42M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs PBPB

Header iconDIN vs PBPB Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs PBPBBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$24.57
Change-$1.20 (-4.66%)
Volume$469.07K
Capitalization383.93M
Potbelly
Price$12.31
Change+$0.45 (+3.79%)
Volume$603.18K
Capitalization371.42M
DIN vs PBPB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. PBPB commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Buy and PBPB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $24.57 vs. PBPB: $12.31)
Brand notoriety: DIN and PBPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 93% vs. PBPB: 289%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $383.93M vs. PBPB: $371.42M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $383.93M. PBPB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $371.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBPB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PBPB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBPB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBPB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBPB is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -9.67% price change this week, while PBPB (@Restaurants) price change was +6.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

PBPB is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIN($384M) and PBPB($371M) have the same market capitalization . PBPB has higher P/E ratio than DIN: PBPB (8.79) vs DIN (6.79). PBPB YTD gains are higher at: 30.679 vs. DIN (-15.049). PBPB has less debt than DIN: PBPB (153M) vs DIN (1.64B).
DINPBPBDIN / PBPB
Capitalization384M371M104%
EBITDAN/A24.5M-
Gain YTD-15.04930.679-49%
P/E Ratio6.798.7977%
RevenueN/A465M-
Total CashN/A14.8M-
Total Debt1.64B153M1,070%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs PBPB: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
PBPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
520
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10031
SMR RATING
1..100
10012
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBPB (87). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that PBPB’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's SMR Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that PBPB’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

PBPB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (60). This means that PBPB’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBPB (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINPBPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERVFF0.040.01
+32.04%
Boron One Holdings Inc.
SHMUY43.65N/A
N/A
Shimizu Corp.
SNPMF0.52N/A
N/A
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
CKPDY1.11N/A
N/A
Cookpad Inc
FPAFY3.58-0.11
-2.98%
First Pacific Company Ltd.

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
-4.66%
BLMN - DIN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
DRI - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
CAKE - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More

PBPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBPB has been loosely correlated with RRGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBPB jumps, then RRGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBPB
1D Price
Change %
PBPB100%
+3.79%
RRGB - PBPB
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
PZZA - PBPB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
DIN - PBPB
37%
Loosely correlated
-4.66%
RICK - PBPB
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
CAVA - PBPB
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More