DIN
Price
$23.68
Change
+$0.38 (+1.63%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
364.18M
53 days until earnings call
JACK
Price
$20.43
Change
+$1.01 (+5.20%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
385.77M
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs JACK

Header iconDIN vs JACK Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs JACKBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$23.68
Change+$0.38 (+1.63%)
Volume$555.42K
Capitalization364.18M
Jack In The Box
Price$20.43
Change+$1.01 (+5.20%)
Volume$1.8M
Capitalization385.77M
DIN vs JACK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. JACK commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and JACK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $23.68 vs. JACK: $20.43)
Brand notoriety: DIN and JACK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 119% vs. JACK: 185%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $364.18M vs. JACK: $385.77M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $364.18M. JACK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $385.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJACK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JACK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than JACK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JACK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JACK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than JACK.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.13% price change this week, while JACK (@Restaurants) price change was +5.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

JACK is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JACK($386M) has a higher market cap than DIN($364M). JACK has higher P/E ratio than DIN: JACK (9.34) vs DIN (7.92). DIN YTD gains are higher at: -18.126 vs. JACK (-50.240). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 178M vs. JACK (61.8M). DIN has more cash in the bank: 194M vs. JACK (38M). DIN has less debt than JACK: DIN (1.64B) vs JACK (3.13B). JACK has higher revenues than DIN: JACK (1.49B) vs DIN (845M).
DINJACKDIN / JACK
Capitalization364M386M94%
EBITDA178M61.8M288%
Gain YTD-18.126-50.24036%
P/E Ratio7.929.3485%
Revenue845M1.49B57%
Total Cash194M38M511%
Total Debt1.64B3.13B52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs JACK: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
JACK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6086
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1486
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5033

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JACK (7). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to JACK’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JACK (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to JACK’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's SMR Rating (1) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that JACK’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JACK (86). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to JACK’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for JACK (86). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than JACK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINJACK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HESAF2373.6338.63
+1.65%
Hermes International SA
BAUFF0.12N/A
+0.60%
Blue Star Gold Corp.
CHHGF0.21N/A
N/A
Chen Hsong Holdings Ltd.
BNTGF58.40N/A
N/A
Brenntag SE
AFXXF15.20N/A
N/A
AFRY AB

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+1.63%
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.16%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
CAKE - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
DRI - DIN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
More

JACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JACK has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JACK jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JACK
1D Price
Change %
JACK100%
+5.20%
DIN - JACK
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
DENN - JACK
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.16%
WEN - JACK
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
CBRL - JACK
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
RICK - JACK
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More