DIN
Price
$32.63
Change
-$0.32 (-0.97%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
470.65M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JACK
Price
$19.11
Change
+$0.27 (+1.43%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
361.12M
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs JACK

Header iconDIN vs JACK Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs JACKBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$32.63
Change-$0.32 (-0.97%)
Volume$211.03K
Capitalization470.65M
Jack In The Box
Price$19.11
Change+$0.27 (+1.43%)
Volume$238.06K
Capitalization361.12M
DIN vs JACK Comparison Chart in %
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JACK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. JACK commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and JACK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $32.63 vs. JACK: $19.11)
Brand notoriety: DIN and JACK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 42% vs. JACK: 23%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $470.65M vs. JACK: $361.12M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $470.65M. JACK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $361.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $223.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJACK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JACK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than JACK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JACK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JACK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than JACK.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while JACK (@Restaurants) price change was -2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

JACK is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.08% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIN($471M) has a higher market cap than JACK($361M). DIN has higher P/E ratio than JACK: DIN (14.57) vs JACK (9.34). DIN YTD gains are higher at: 15.232 vs. JACK (-53.455). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 165M vs. JACK (36.2M). DIN has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. JACK (51.5M). DIN has less debt than JACK: DIN (1.63B) vs JACK (3.12B). JACK has higher revenues than DIN: JACK (1.47B) vs DIN (866M).
DINJACKDIN / JACK
Capitalization471M361M130%
EBITDA165M36.2M456%
Gain YTD15.232-53.455-28%
P/E Ratio14.579.34156%
Revenue866M1.47B59%
Total Cash168M51.5M326%
Total Debt1.63B3.12B52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs JACK: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
JACK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
585
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JACK (16). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to JACK’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JACK (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to JACK’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's SMR Rating (1) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that JACK’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JACK (57). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to JACK’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for JACK (85). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than JACK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINJACK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JACK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCAP7.250.99
+15.81%
MCAP Inc.
CBAUF108.72N/A
N/A
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
MGPUF3.76N/A
N/A
M&G PLC
PJXRF0.10N/A
N/A
PJX Res Inc
HTSUY6.65N/A
N/A
Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been closely correlated with CBRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then CBRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
-0.97%
CBRL - DIN
70%
Closely correlated
+2.56%
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
BJRI - DIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
CAKE - DIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
FWRG - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More

JACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JACK has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JACK jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JACK
1D Price
Change %
JACK100%
+1.43%
DIN - JACK
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
WEN - JACK
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
FWRG - JACK
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
DENN - JACK
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RICK - JACK
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More