DIN
Price
$23.86
Change
+$0.60 (+2.58%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
363.46M
16 days until earnings call
GTIM
Price
$1.58
Change
-$0.05 (-3.05%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.37M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs GTIM

Header iconDIN vs GTIM Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs GTIMBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$23.86
Change+$0.60 (+2.58%)
Volume$2.73K
Capitalization363.46M
Good Times Restaurants
Price$1.58
Change-$0.05 (-3.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization17.37M
DIN vs GTIM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. GTIM commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and GTIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $23.26 vs. GTIM: $1.64)
Brand notoriety: DIN and GTIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 107% vs. GTIM: 259%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $363.46M vs. GTIM: $17.37M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $363.46M. GTIM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $17.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GTIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than GTIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTIM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • GTIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTIM is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -6.81% price change this week, while GTIM (@Restaurants) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

GTIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.14% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIN($363M) has a higher market cap than GTIM($17.4M). GTIM has higher P/E ratio than DIN: GTIM (18.22) vs DIN (6.43). DIN YTD gains are higher at: -19.579 vs. GTIM (-36.680). GTIM has less debt than DIN: GTIM (45.3M) vs DIN (1.64B).
DINGTIMDIN / GTIM
Capitalization363M17.4M2,086%
EBITDAN/A4.83M-
Gain YTD-19.579-36.68053%
P/E Ratio6.4318.2235%
RevenueN/A144M-
Total CashN/A2.71M-
Total Debt1.64B45.3M3,614%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs GTIM: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
GTIM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
10085
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6286
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5294
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTIM (47). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTIM’s over the last 12 months.

GTIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that GTIM’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

GTIM's SMR Rating (85) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that GTIM’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as GTIM (86). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to GTIM’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTIM (94). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTIM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINGTIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSUAY16.450.24
+1.46%
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
CHBH48.06N/A
N/A
Croghan Bancshares, Inc.
MISVF0.22N/A
N/A
Minco Silver Corp.
DPCDF10.87N/A
N/A
DPC DASH LTD
BGKKF4.30N/A
N/A
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+0.35%
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
DRI - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
CAKE - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More

GTIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTIM and KRUS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTIM and KRUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTIM
1D Price
Change %
GTIM100%
+3.80%
KRUS - GTIM
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.15%
JACK - GTIM
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
DIN - GTIM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
FWRG - GTIM
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
CNNE - GTIM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More