DIN
Price
$23.19
Change
-$0.76 (-3.17%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
368.33M
57 days until earnings call
FAT
Price
$1.88
Change
+$0.07 (+3.87%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.74M
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs FAT

Header iconDIN vs FAT Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs FATBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$23.19
Change-$0.76 (-3.17%)
Volume$2.43K
Capitalization368.33M
FAT Brands
Price$1.88
Change+$0.07 (+3.87%)
Volume$500
Capitalization33.74M
DIN vs FAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. FAT commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Buy and FAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $23.95 vs. FAT: $1.81)
Brand notoriety: DIN and FAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 137% vs. FAT: 37%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $368.33M vs. FAT: $33.74M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $368.33M. FAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $33.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $223.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +7.02% price change this week, while FAT (@Restaurants) price change was -3.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

FAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIN($368M) has a higher market cap than FAT($33.7M). DIN YTD gains are higher at: -17.193 vs. FAT (-38.934). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 178M vs. FAT (-34.51M). DIN has more cash in the bank: 194M vs. FAT (7.65M). FAT has less debt than DIN: FAT (1.49B) vs DIN (1.64B). DIN has higher revenues than FAT: DIN (845M) vs FAT (578M).
DINFATDIN / FAT
Capitalization368M33.7M1,092%
EBITDA178M-34.51M-516%
Gain YTD-17.193-38.93444%
P/E Ratio8.01N/A-
Revenue845M578M146%
Total Cash194M7.65M2,537%
Total Debt1.64B1.49B110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs FAT: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5891
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAT's Valuation (2) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (4). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's SMR Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAT (91). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINFAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSB0.80N/A
+0.01%
LakeShore Biopharma Co Ltd
EB2.65-0.01
-0.38%
Eventbrite
MSTR334.41-4.43
-1.31%
Strategy Inc
CZR26.77-0.48
-1.76%
Caesars Entertainment
SPRY11.62-1.24
-9.64%
ARS Pharmaceuticals

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BLMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+4.09%
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
CBRL - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
CAKE - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
DRI - DIN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
+0.56%
SBUX - FAT
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
GENK - FAT
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
RICK - FAT
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
DIN - FAT
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
TXRH - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More