Advertisement
DIISF vs FGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIISF is a Hold and FGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DIISF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DIISF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DIISF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DIISF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
- FGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
DIISF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +7.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.75% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
| DIISF | FGF | DIISF / FGF | |
| Capitalization | 2.54B | 40M | 6,340% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.951 | -15.597 | -224% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.27 | 6.71 | 138% |
| Revenue | 3.15B | 23.7M | 13,287% |
| Total Cash | 4.15B | 2.4M | 173,247% |
| Total Debt | 405M | 387K | 104,651% |
DIISF | FGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DIISF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGF (86) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DIISF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.
DIISF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as FGF (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DIISF’s stock grew similarly to FGF’s over the last 12 months.
DIISF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FGF (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DIISF’s stock grew similarly to FGF’s over the last 12 months.
DIISF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FGF (57) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DIISF’s stock grew similarly to FGF’s over the last 12 months.
DIISF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGF (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DIISF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGF’s over the last 12 months.
| DIISF | FGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 10% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 24% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 23% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 37% | N/A |
Advertisement
DIISF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DIISF and DIISY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DIISF and DIISY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DIISF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIISF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DIISY - DIISF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AIVAF - DIISF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AEG - DIISF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FGF - DIISF | 8% Poorly correlated | +7.16% | ||
| SLF - DIISF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||
FGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGF and FIHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGF and FIHL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGF | 100% | +7.16% | ||
| FIHL - FGF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| IGIC - FGF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| DIISF - FGF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ORI - FGF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| SLF - FGF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||