Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIHP vs QINT
DIHP vs QINT Comparison
Open Charts DIHP vs QINT
Dimensional International High Pbly ETF
Price$30.92
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
Volume$360.02K
Net Assets4.68B
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$61.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25.43K
Net Assets411.45M
DIHP vs QINT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIHP vs. QINT commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIHP is a Hold and QINT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIHP has more net assets: 4.68B vs. QINT (411M). QINT has a higher annual dividend yield than DIHP: QINT (30.645) vs DIHP (24.766). DIHP was incepted earlier than QINT: DIHP (4 years) vs QINT (7 years). DIHP (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than QINT (0.39). QINT has a higher turnover DIHP (17.00) vs DIHP (17.00).
| DIHP | QINT | DIHP / QINT | |
| Gain YTD | 24.766 | 30.645 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 411M | 1,138% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.39 | 72% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 78.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 2.17 | 2.50 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DIHP | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DIHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIHP has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIHP jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DIHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIHP | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| RY - DIHP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| BHP - DIHP | 68% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| MFC - DIHP | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| FER - DIHP | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| BBVA - DIHP | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | -0.00% | ||
| SAN - QINT | 74% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| MFC - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| MT - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||