DIBS
Price
$5.93
Change
+$0.10 (+1.72%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
217.12M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
W
Price
$100.71
Change
-$0.89 (-0.88%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.13B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIBS vs W

Header iconDIBS vs W Comparison
Open Charts DIBS vs WBanner chart's image
1stdibs.com
Price$5.93
Change+$0.10 (+1.72%)
Volume$119.83K
Capitalization217.12M
Wayfair
Price$100.71
Change-$0.89 (-0.88%)
Volume$666.14K
Capitalization13.13B
DIBS vs W Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIBS vs. W commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIBS is a Hold and W is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (DIBS: $5.93 vs. W: $100.71)
Brand notoriety: DIBS: Not notable vs. W: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIBS: 35% vs. W: 19%
Market capitalization -- DIBS: $217.12M vs. W: $13.13B
DIBS [@Internet Retail] is valued at $217.12M. W’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $13.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.48T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $52.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • W’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIBS is a better buy in the long-term than W.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIBS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while W’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • W’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, W is a better buy in the short-term than DIBS.

Price Growth

DIBS (@Internet Retail) experienced а -3.58% price change this week, while W (@Internet Retail) price change was -1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIBS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

W is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+1.09% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
W($13.1B) has a higher market cap than DIBS($217M). W YTD gains are higher at: 127.234 vs. DIBS (67.514). W has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 105M vs. DIBS (-10.56M). W has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. DIBS (93.4M). DIBS has less debt than W: DIBS (19.7M) vs W (3.61B). W has higher revenues than DIBS: W (12.2B) vs DIBS (89.4M).
DIBSWDIBS / W
Capitalization217M13.1B2%
EBITDA-10.56M105M-10%
Gain YTD67.514127.23453%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue89.4M12.2B1%
Total Cash93.4M1.23B8%
Total Debt19.7M3.61B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
W: Fundamental Ratings
W
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIBSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
W
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFIX38.600.74
+1.95%
Simplify Downside Interest Rate Hedge Strategy ETF
PCY21.800.12
+0.55%
Invesco Emerging Markets Sov Debt ETF
BNDS50.600.08
+0.17%
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
AHYB46.670.08
+0.16%
American Century® Select High Yield ETF
CLOU22.880.01
+0.04%
Global X Cloud Computing ETF

DIBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIBS has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIBS jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIBS
1D Price
Change %
DIBS100%
+1.72%
CVNA - DIBS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
CPNG - DIBS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
W - DIBS
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
AMZN - DIBS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
GLBE - DIBS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More

W and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, W has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if W jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To W
1D Price
Change %
W100%
-0.88%
CVNA - W
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
RVLV - W
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
AMZN - W
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
GLBE - W
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
BBBY - W
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
More