DIBS
Price
$2.72
Change
+$0.04 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.63M
16 days until earnings call
LQDT
Price
$24.56
Change
-$0.24 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
774.27M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIBS vs LQDT

Header iconDIBS vs LQDT Comparison
Open Charts DIBS vs LQDTBanner chart's image
1stdibs.com
Price$2.72
Change+$0.04 (+1.49%)
Volume$528
Capitalization95.63M
Liquidity Services
Price$24.56
Change-$0.24 (-0.97%)
Volume$1.19K
Capitalization774.27M
DIBS vs LQDT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIBS vs. LQDT commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIBS is a Hold and LQDT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (DIBS: $2.69 vs. LQDT: $24.52)
Brand notoriety: DIBS and LQDT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIBS: 17% vs. LQDT: 68%
Market capitalization -- DIBS: $95.99M vs. LQDT: $765.53M
DIBS [@Internet Retail] is valued at $95.99M. LQDT’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $765.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $47.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLQDT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LQDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the long-term than DIBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQDT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LQDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the short-term than DIBS.

Price Growth

DIBS (@Internet Retail) experienced а -4.61% price change this week, while LQDT (@Internet Retail) price change was +1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +113.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

LQDT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.09% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LQDT($774M) has a higher market cap than DIBS($95.6M). LQDT (-23.196) and DIBS (-23.729) have similar YTD gains . LQDT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.2M vs. DIBS (-14.02M). LQDT has more cash in the bank: 149M vs. DIBS (101M). LQDT has less debt than DIBS: LQDT (14.8M) vs DIBS (21.1M). LQDT has higher revenues than DIBS: LQDT (439M) vs DIBS (88.7M).
DIBSLQDTDIBS / LQDT
Capitalization95.6M774M12%
EBITDA-14.02M40.2M-35%
Gain YTD-23.729-23.196102%
P/E RatioN/A31.39-
Revenue88.7M439M20%
Total Cash101M149M68%
Total Debt21.1M14.8M143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIBSLQDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDIMF8.790.63
+7.72%
Black Diamond Group Ltd
VTTGF341.10N/A
N/A
VAT Group AG
TGCB0.04N/A
N/A
Tego Cyber Inc.
FRZCF1.73N/A
N/A
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
NTBP1250.00N/A
N/A
New Tripoli Bancorp, Inc.

DIBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DIBS and AMZN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DIBS and AMZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIBS
1D Price
Change %
DIBS100%
N/A
AMZN - DIBS
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
W - DIBS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
GLBE - DIBS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
RVLV - DIBS
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
ETSY - DIBS
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
More

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LQDT and SE have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LQDT and SE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
-1.43%
SE - LQDT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIBS - LQDT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CART - LQDT
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
GLBE - LQDT
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
JD - LQDT
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
More