DIBS
Price
$2.81
Change
-$0.02 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
100.63M
38 days until earnings call
IPW
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.01 (-1.61%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.19M
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIBS vs IPW

Header iconDIBS vs IPW Comparison
Open Charts DIBS vs IPWBanner chart's image
1stdibs.com
Price$2.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.71%)
Volume$3.09M
Capitalization100.63M
iPower
Price$0.61
Change-$0.01 (-1.61%)
Volume$109.95K
Capitalization19.19M
DIBS vs IPW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIBS vs. IPW commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIBS is a Hold and IPW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DIBS: $2.81 vs. IPW: $0.61)
Brand notoriety: DIBS and IPW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIBS: 1624% vs. IPW: 26%
Market capitalization -- DIBS: $100.63M vs. IPW: $19.19M
DIBS [@Internet Retail] is valued at $100.63M. IPW’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $19.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.37T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $46.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIPW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IPW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPW is a better buy in the long-term than DIBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IPW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IPW is a better buy in the short-term than DIBS.

Price Growth

DIBS (@Internet Retail) experienced а +5.24% price change this week, while IPW (@Internet Retail) price change was -15.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

IPW is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+1.75% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIBS($101M) has a higher market cap than IPW($19.2M). DIBS YTD gains are higher at: -20.621 vs. IPW (-26.501). IPW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.6M vs. DIBS (-14.02M). DIBS has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. IPW (2.19M). IPW has less debt than DIBS: IPW (8.23M) vs DIBS (21.1M). DIBS has higher revenues than IPW: DIBS (88.7M) vs IPW (74.1M).
DIBSIPWDIBS / IPW
Capitalization101M19.2M526%
EBITDA-14.02M1.6M-876%
Gain YTD-20.621-26.50178%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue88.7M74.1M120%
Total Cash101M2.19M4,608%
Total Debt21.1M8.23M256%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPW: Fundamental Ratings
IPW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIBSIPW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IPW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCS18.33N/A
N/A
Barclays PLC
MBOT2.49N/A
-0.12%
Microbot Medical
OSIS224.05-0.46
-0.20%
OSI Systems
LANV2.04-0.05
-2.39%
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited
METCB7.29-0.35
-4.58%
Ramaco Resources

IPW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPW has been loosely correlated with MI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPW jumps, then MI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPW
1D Price
Change %
IPW100%
-0.79%
MI - IPW
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
JFBR - IPW
26%
Poorly correlated
-21.31%
DIBS - IPW
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
EBAY - IPW
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
AKA - IPW
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More