Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIAYX vs NLSCX
DIAYX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts DIAYX vs NLSCX
Diamond Hill Long-Short Y
Price$31.63
Change+$0.60 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
DIAYX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIAYX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIAYX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. DIAYX (2.29B). DIAYX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: DIAYX (1.65) vs NLSCX (0.00). DIAYX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: DIAYX (14 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than DIAYX (1.34). DIAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DIAYX: NLSCX (1000) vs DIAYX (500000). DIAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. NLSCX (2.65). DIAYX return over 5 years is better than : 26.54 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| DIAYX | NLSCX | DIAYX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.43 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.43 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.249 | -0.693 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 8.16B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.33 | 2.65 | 504% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.90 | 22.54 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.54 | 14.66 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.78 | 52.68 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement