Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIAMX vs NLSCX
DIAMX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts DIAMX vs NLSCX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$30.45
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
DIAMX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIAMX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIAMX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. DIAMX (2.32B). DIAMX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: DIAMX (1.33) vs NLSCX (0.00). DIAMX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: DIAMX (26 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than DIAMX (1.75). NLSCX (48.00) and DIAMX (46.00) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DIAMX: NLSCX (1000) vs DIAMX (2500). DIAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.04 vs. NLSCX (5.11). DIAMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.39 vs. NLSCX (17.08).
| DIAMX | NLSCX | DIAMX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.393 | -0.160 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 7.96B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.04 | 5.11 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.13 | 23.52 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.39 | 17.08 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.70 | 52.97 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement