Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIAMX vs NLSCX
DIAMX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts DIAMX vs NLSCX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$28.71
Change-$0.06 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
DIAMX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIAMX vs. NLSCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIAMX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.6B vs. DIAMX (1.95B). DIAMX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: DIAMX (1.90) vs NLSCX (0.00). DIAMX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: DIAMX (25 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than DIAMX (1.75). NLSCX (48.00) and DIAMX (46.00) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DIAMX: NLSCX (1000) vs DIAMX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. DIAMX (3.15). DIAMX return over 5 years is better than : 26.16 vs. NLSCX (19.56).
| DIAMX | NLSCX | DIAMX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.000 | 5.370 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 7.6B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.15 | 8.18 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.08 | 12.09 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.16 | 19.56 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.60 | 38.61 | 66% |