Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIAMX vs HHCZX
DIAMX vs HHCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIAMX vs. HHCZX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIAMX is a Hold and HHCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIAMX has more cash in the bank: 2.32B vs. HHCZX (91.6M). DIAMX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: DIAMX (1.33) vs HHCZX (0.00). DIAMX was incepted earlier than HHCZX: DIAMX (26 years) vs HHCZX (18 years). HHCZX (2.75) is less costly to investors than DIAMX (1.75). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 397.00 vs. DIAMX (46.00). DIAMX (2500) and HHCZX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DIAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.97 vs. HHCZX (9.74). DIAMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.07 vs. HHCZX (-6.16).
| DIAMX | HHCZX | DIAMX / HHCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.30 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.75 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.654 | 3.087 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 91.6M | 2,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.97 | 9.74 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.79 | 23.56 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.07 | -6.16 | -374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.31 | 49.78 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement