Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DHLSX vs RLSFX
DHLSX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts DHLSX vs RLSFX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$31.42
Change+$0.63 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.47
Change-$0.82 (-5.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.08M
DHLSX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DHLSX vs. RLSFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHLSX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. RLSFX (32.1M). DHLSX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: DHLSX (1.57) vs RLSFX (0.00). DHLSX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: DHLSX (21 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). DHLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RLSFX (20.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DHLSX: RLSFX (1000) vs DHLSX (2500). DHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. RLSFX (1.33). DHLSX return over 5 years is better than : 25.64 vs. RLSFX (-22.29).
| DHLSX | RLSFX | DHLSX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.00 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.17 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.226 | -4.425 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 32.1M | 7,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | 1.33 | 995% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.44 | 48.87 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.64 | -22.29 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.77 | 52.89 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement