Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DHLSX vs RLSFX
DHLSX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts DHLSX vs RLSFX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$30.68
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$15.09
Change+$0.06 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.24M
DHLSX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DHLSX vs. RLSFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHLSX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. RLSFX (36.2M). DHLSX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: DHLSX (2.02) vs RLSFX (0.00). DHLSX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: DHLSX (21 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). DHLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DHLSX: RLSFX (1000) vs DHLSX (2500). RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. DHLSX (4.32). DHLSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.23 vs. RLSFX (-10.45).
| DHLSX | RLSFX | DHLSX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.00 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.17 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.043 | 8.095 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 36.2M | 5,831% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 11.20 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.02 | 78.58 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.23 | -10.45 | -328% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.54 | 48.51 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement