DHLGY vs TTNMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHLGY is a Hold and TTNMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DHLGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTNMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DHLGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
DHLGY (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -2.13% price change this week, while TTNMF (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -6.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
DHLGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Air Freight/Couriers (-0.85% weekly)The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
| DHLGY | TTNMF | DHLGY / TTNMF | |
| Capitalization | 61.7B | 95.2M | 64,811% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 65.2M | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.310 | -13.636 | 171% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.22 | 5.61 | 182% |
| Revenue | N/A | 467M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 42.6M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 137M | - |
DHLGY | TTNMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DHLGY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as TTNMF (36). This means that DHLGY’s stock grew similarly to TTNMF’s over the last 12 months.
TTNMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as DHLGY (100). This means that TTNMF’s stock grew similarly to DHLGY’s over the last 12 months.
TTNMF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DHLGY (100). This means that TTNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DHLGY’s over the last 12 months.
TTNMF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as DHLGY (77). This means that TTNMF’s stock grew similarly to DHLGY’s over the last 12 months.
TTNMF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DHLGY (60). This means that TTNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DHLGY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
DHLGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHLGY has been loosely correlated with DPSTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DHLGY jumps, then DPSTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DHLGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DHLGY | 100% | -1.84% | ||
| DPSTF - DHLGY | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.32% | ||
| DSDVY - DHLGY | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| KHNGY - DHLGY | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| JBHT - DHLGY | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
| HUBG - DHLGY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
More | ||||
TTNMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTNMF has been closely correlated with OSTIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTNMF jumps, then OSTIY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTNMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTNMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OSTIY - TTNMF | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| DPSTF - TTNMF | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.32% | ||
| DSDVY - TTNMF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| DHLGY - TTNMF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.84% | ||
| QUBHF - TTNMF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||