It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DGHI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FTFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +20.03% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.91%.
FTFT is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2023.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
DGHI | FTFT | DGHI / FTFT | |
Capitalization | 41.6M | 19.7M | 211% |
EBITDA | -8.06M | -11.58M | 70% |
Gain YTD | -17.904 | -78.880 | 23% |
P/E Ratio | 10.18 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 21M | 32M | 66% |
Total Cash | 866K | 33.7M | 3% |
Total Debt | 1.88M | 1.5M | 125% |
DGHI | FTFT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DGHI's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTFT (99) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that DGHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTFT’s over the last 12 months.
DGHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as FTFT (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that DGHI’s stock grew similarly to FTFT’s over the last 12 months.
FTFT's SMR Rating (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as DGHI (97) in the null industry. This means that FTFT’s stock grew similarly to DGHI’s over the last 12 months.
DGHI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as FTFT (42) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that DGHI’s stock grew similarly to FTFT’s over the last 12 months.
FTFT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for DGHI (100) in the null industry. This means that FTFT’s stock grew significantly faster than DGHI’s over the last 12 months.
DGHI | FTFT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGHI has been loosely correlated with ANY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGHI jumps, then ANY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DGHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DGHI | 100% | -6.93% | ||
ANY - DGHI | 47% Loosely correlated | -12.00% | ||
BTDR - DGHI | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
FTFT - DGHI | 34% Loosely correlated | -14.11% | ||
U - DGHI | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
CGNT - DGHI | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTFT has been loosely correlated with BTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTFT jumps, then BTDR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FTFT | 100% | -14.11% | ||
BTDR - FTFT | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
ANY - FTFT | 37% Loosely correlated | -12.00% | ||
DGHI - FTFT | 34% Loosely correlated | -6.93% | ||
MSTR - FTFT | 33% Loosely correlated | -7.91% | ||
SQ - FTFT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
More |