DGDCF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.17M
ECRFF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
46.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DGDCF vs ECRFF

Header iconDGDCF vs ECRFF Comparison
Open Charts DGDCF vs ECRFFBanner chart's image
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.08K
Capitalization7.17M
Cartier Resources
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$184.91K
Capitalization46.59M
DGDCF vs ECRFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DGDCF vs. ECRFF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGDCF is a Hold and ECRFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (DGDCF: $0.12 vs. ECRFF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: DGDCF and ECRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DGDCF: 85% vs. ECRFF: 279%
Market capitalization -- DGDCF: $7.17M vs. ECRFF: $46.59M
DGDCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.17M. ECRFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $46.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DGDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileECRFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ECRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DGDCF and ECRFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DGDCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECRFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ECRFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DGDCF and ECRFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DGDCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.86% price change this week, while ECRFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +22.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECRFF($46.6M) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($7.17M). ECRFF YTD gains are higher at: 71.875 vs. DGDCF (26.853). DGDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -638.08K vs. ECRFF (-11.38M). DGDCF has more cash in the bank: 2.23M vs. ECRFF (714K). DGDCF (0) and ECRFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DGDCFECRFFDGDCF / ECRFF
Capitalization7.17M46.6M15%
EBITDA-638.08K-11.38M6%
Gain YTD26.85371.87537%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.23M714K312%
Total DebtN/A74.1K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DGDCF vs ECRFF: Fundamental Ratings
DGDCF
ECRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
9396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DGDCF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRFF (41). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to ECRFF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRFF (100). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to ECRFF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRFF (96). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to ECRFF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRFF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (44). This means that ECRFF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (100). This means that ECRFF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DGDCFECRFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APH109.981.43
+1.32%
Amphenol Corp
WSBF13.620.17
+1.26%
Waterstone Financial
PIPR322.981.73
+0.54%
Piper Sandler Companies
IPX37.65-0.69
-1.81%
IperionX Limited
SCOR6.99-0.13
-1.83%
comScore

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and ABNAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and ABNAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
+1.37%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+26.19%
DPMLF - DGDCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
ECRFF - DGDCF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%

ECRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRFF and CNL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRFF and CNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRFF
1D Price
Change %
ECRFF100%
+0.46%
CNL - ECRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
LVXFF - ECRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DGDCF - ECRFF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
DPMLF - ECRFF
-10%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%