DGDCF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.2M
DNCVF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
25.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DGDCF vs DNCVF

Header iconDGDCF vs DNCVF Comparison
Open Charts DGDCF vs DNCVFBanner chart's image
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization15.2M
Defiance Silver
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$265.9K
Capitalization25.54M
DGDCF vs DNCVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DGDCF vs. DNCVF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGDCF is a Hold and DNCVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (DGDCF: $0.10 vs. DNCVF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: DGDCF and DNCVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DGDCF: 100% vs. DNCVF: 70%
Market capitalization -- DGDCF: $15.2M vs. DNCVF: $25.54M
DGDCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.2M. DNCVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DGDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDNCVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DNCVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DGDCF and DNCVF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DGDCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNCVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DNCVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DGDCF is a better buy in the short-term than DNCVF.

Price Growth

DGDCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.49% price change this week, while DNCVF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNCVF($25.5M) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($15.2M). DNCVF YTD gains are higher at: 32.597 vs. DGDCF (3.867). DGDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -326.02K vs. DNCVF (-2.86M). DGDCF has more cash in the bank: 955K vs. DNCVF (705K). DGDCF (0) and DNCVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DGDCFDNCVFDGDCF / DNCVF
Capitalization15.2M25.5M60%
EBITDA-326.02K-2.86M11%
Gain YTD3.86732.59712%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash955K705K135%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DGDCF vs DNCVF: Fundamental Ratings
DGDCF
DNCVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7598
SMR RATING
1..100
9293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
23n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DGDCF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as DNCVF (38). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to DNCVF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as DNCVF (98). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to DNCVF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as DNCVF (93). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to DNCVF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as DNCVF (61). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to DNCVF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DNCVF (100). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to DNCVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DGDCFDNCVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRPRY4.940.33
+7.14%
DR ING H C F PORSCHE AG
DYSL1.85N/A
N/A
Dynasil Corp. of America
SHALF0.56N/A
N/A
Shangri-La Asia Ltd.
BDOUY27.55-0.07
-0.24%
BDO Unibank Inc.
CFWFF2.48-0.01
-0.44%
Calfrac Well Services Ltd.

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and ABNAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and ABNAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
+2.87%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.27%
DNCVF - DGDCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
DPMLF - DGDCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
DYNR - DGDCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
DNGDF - DGDCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
More

DNCVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNCVF has been loosely correlated with SSVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNCVF jumps, then SSVRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNCVF
1D Price
Change %
DNCVF100%
-4.60%
SSVRF - DNCVF
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.70%
OCGSF - DNCVF
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.99%
LUGDF - DNCVF
35%
Loosely correlated
-8.59%
LGDTF - DNCVF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
TORXF - DNCVF
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
More