Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DGAGX vs GFAFX
DGAGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts DGAGX vs GFAFX
BNY Mellon Appreciation Investor
Price$42.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
DGAGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DGAGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGAGX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. DGAGX (2.07B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than DGAGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs DGAGX (0.25). DGAGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: DGAGX (42 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). DGAGX (0.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. DGAGX (12.56). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGAGX: GFAFX (250) vs DGAGX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. DGAGX (-8.42). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. DGAGX (9.30).
| DGAGX | GFAFX | DGAGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.67 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.594 | 19.672 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.28 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.42 | 8.83 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.23 | 64.95 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.30 | 40.08 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.46 | 102.20 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement