Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DGAGX vs GFAFX
DGAGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts DGAGX vs GFAFX
BNY Mellon Appreciation Investor
Price$41.15
Change+$0.24 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
DGAGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DGAGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGAGX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. DGAGX (2.05B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than DGAGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs DGAGX (0.26). DGAGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: DGAGX (42 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). DGAGX (0.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. DGAGX (12.56). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGAGX: GFAFX (250) vs DGAGX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. DGAGX (-9.00). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. DGAGX (9.83).
| DGAGX | GFAFX | DGAGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.67 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.266 | 17.923 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.29 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.00 | 11.53 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.53 | 72.21 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.83 | 40.02 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.97 | 100.61 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement