Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WMMCX
DFSTX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WMMCX
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$11.58
Change+$0.18 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.78M
DFSTX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 18.3B vs. WMMCX (190M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: DFSTX (1.08) vs WMMCX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: DFSTX (34 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). DFSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: DFSTX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. WMMCX (-2.61). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. WMMCX (-46.70).
| DFSTX | WMMCX | DFSTX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 2.25 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 2.25 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.230 | 8.427 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 190M | 9,632% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.29 | -2.61 | -510% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | -29.75 | -137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.32 | -46.70 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.53 | -34.69 | -376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement