Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WMCVX
DFSTX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WMCVX
DFSTX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WMCVX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 17.5B vs. WMCVX (1.37B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: DFSTX (1.05) vs WMCVX (0.06). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: DFSTX (34 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMCVX: DFSTX (0) vs WMCVX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. WMCVX (-8.28). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.03 vs. WMCVX (1.42).
| DFSTX | WMCVX | DFSTX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.18 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.18 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.315 | -6.788 | -152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 1.37B | 1,274% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.06 | 1,685% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | -8.28 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.56 | 13.93 | 306% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.03 | 1.42 | 3,182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.08 | 54.66 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement