Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WMCVX
DFSTX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WMCVX
DFSTX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WMCVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 18.1B vs. WMCVX (1.43B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: DFSTX (1.02) vs WMCVX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: DFSTX (34 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMCVX: DFSTX (0) vs WMCVX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.21 vs. WMCVX (-3.89). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.07 vs. WMCVX (-3.51).
| DFSTX | WMCVX | DFSTX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.18 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.18 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.752 | 7.589 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 1.43B | 1,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | -3.89 | -340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | 2.61 | 1,288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.07 | -3.51 | -1,084% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.31 | 85.61 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement