Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WMCVX
DFSTX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WMCVX
DFSTX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WMCVX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. WMCVX (1.55B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: DFSTX (1.07) vs WMCVX (0.06). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: DFSTX (34 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. DFSTX (6.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMCVX: DFSTX (0) vs WMCVX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. WMCVX (-18.75). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 62.62 vs. WMCVX (30.24).
| DFSTX | WMCVX | DFSTX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.18 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.18 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.893 | -1.520 | -322% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8B | 1.55B | 1,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.06 | 1,770% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.09 | -18.75 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.06 | 23.73 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.62 | 30.24 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.60 | 59.15 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement