Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs SZCCX
DFSTX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs SZCCX
DFSTX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. SZCCX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and SZCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 18.3B vs. SZCCX (1.12B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: DFSTX (1.08) vs SZCCX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: DFSTX (34 years) vs SZCCX (25 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). SZCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. DFSTX (6.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SZCCX: DFSTX (0) vs SZCCX (1000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. SZCCX (3.85). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. SZCCX (37.27).
| DFSTX | SZCCX | DFSTX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.96 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.96 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.230 | 5.004 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 1.12B | 1,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.29 | 3.85 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | 24.86 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.32 | 37.27 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.53 | 131.03 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement