Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs SZCCX
DFSTX vs SZCCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs SZCCX
DFSTX vs SZCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. SZCCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and SZCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 17.5B vs. SZCCX (1.1B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than SZCCX: DFSTX (1.05) vs SZCCX (0.10). DFSTX was incepted earlier than SZCCX: DFSTX (34 years) vs SZCCX (25 years). SZCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). SZCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. DFSTX (6.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SZCCX: DFSTX (0) vs SZCCX (1000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. SZCCX (2.35). DFSTX (44.84) and SZCCX (43.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DFSTX | SZCCX | DFSTX / SZCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.96 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.96 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.170 | 3.858 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 1.1B | 1,589% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.10 | 1,016% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 2.35 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.48 | 23.91 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.84 | 43.22 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.81 | 95.25 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement