Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs RPFFX
DFSTX vs RPFFX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs RPFFX
DFSTX vs RPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. RPFFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and RPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 18.1B vs. RPFFX (1.08B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than RPFFX: DFSTX (1.02) vs RPFFX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than RPFFX: DFSTX (34 years) vs RPFFX (23 years). RPFFX (1.59) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). RPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFFX: DFSTX (0) vs RPFFX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.21 vs. RPFFX (4.06). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.07 vs. RPFFX (-20.79).
| DFSTX | RPFFX | DFSTX / RPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.49 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.59 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.752 | 11.437 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 1.08B | 1,677% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | 4.06 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | -1.70 | -1,983% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.07 | -20.79 | -183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.31 | -12.79 | -1,026% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement