Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs RMCFX
DFSTX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs RMCFX
DFSTX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. RMCFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 18.1B vs. RMCFX (336M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: DFSTX (1.02) vs RMCFX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: DFSTX (34 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.54) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: DFSTX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.21 vs. RMCFX (11.89). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.07 vs. RMCFX (-15.29).
| DFSTX | RMCFX | DFSTX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.49 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.54 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.752 | 11.466 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 336M | 5,387% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | 11.89 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | 8.21 | 410% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.07 | -15.29 | -249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.31 | 24.22 | 542% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers