Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs NMSAX
DFSTX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs NMSAX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.88
Change-$0.25 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
DFSTX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. NMSAX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 17.5B vs. NMSAX (2.6B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than DFSTX: NMSAX (1.17) vs DFSTX (1.05). DFSTX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: DFSTX (34 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. DFSTX (6.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: DFSTX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.38 vs. NMSAX (-8.93). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. NMSAX (-5.16).
| DFSTX | NMSAX | DFSTX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.45 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.45 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.572 | -2.382 | -486% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 2.6B | 674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.17 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | -8.93 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | -0.85 | -4,779% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.55 | -5.16 | -981% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.27 | 19.34 | 477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers