Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs FSLCX
DFSTX vs FSLCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs FSLCX
DFSTX vs FSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. FSLCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and FSLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. FSLCX (1.2B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than FSLCX: DFSTX (1.07) vs FSLCX (0.04). DFSTX was incepted earlier than FSLCX: DFSTX (34 years) vs FSLCX (28 years). FSLCX (0.87) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). FSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.00 vs. DFSTX (6.00). DFSTX (0) and FSLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. FSLCX (-1.02). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 62.62 vs. FSLCX (5.60).
| DFSTX | FSLCX | DFSTX / FSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.87 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.893 | 5.736 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.8B | 1.2B | 1,405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.04 | 2,501% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.09 | -1.02 | -303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.06 | 37.69 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.62 | 5.60 | 1,118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.60 | 7.24 | 1,017% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement