Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSIX vs RWMFX
DFSIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts DFSIX vs RWMFX
DFA US Sustainability Core 1
Price$50.26
Change+$0.53 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.36B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.04B
DFSIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. DFSIX (8.36B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than DFSIX: RWMFX (1.43) vs DFSIX (0.92). DFSIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: DFSIX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than DFSIX (0.17). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. DFSIX (4.00). DFSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: DFSIX (0) vs RWMFX (250). DFSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.63 vs. RWMFX (7.95). DFSIX return over 5 years is better than : 99.11 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| DFSIX | RWMFX | DFSIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.31 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.31 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.533 | 8.213 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.36B | 204B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.43 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.63 | 7.95 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.50 | 34.82 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.11 | 50.81 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 224.12 | 83.34 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement