DFRYF
Price
$51.21
Change
-$1.79 (-3.38%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FKRAF
Price
$14.71
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DFRYF vs FKRAF

Header iconDFRYF vs FKRAF Comparison
Open Charts DFRYF vs FKRAFBanner chart's image
AVOLTA AG
Price$51.21
Change-$1.79 (-3.38%)
Volume$4
Capitalization8.19B
Fiskars OY AKT
Price$14.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$433
Capitalization1.19B
DFRYF vs FKRAF Comparison Chart in %
DFRYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FKRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DFRYF vs. FKRAF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFRYF is a Hold and FKRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DFRYF: $51.21 vs. FKRAF: $14.71)
Brand notoriety: DFRYF and FKRAF are both not notable
DFRYF represents the Specialty Stores, while FKRAF is part of the Home Improvement Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DFRYF: 7% vs. FKRAF: 29%
Market capitalization -- DFRYF: $8.19B vs. FKRAF: $1.19B
DFRYF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8.19B. FKRAF’s [@Home Improvement Chains] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $48.51B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $356.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $40.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DFRYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFKRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DFRYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FKRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DFRYF and FKRAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DFRYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DFRYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FKRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKRAF is a better buy in the short-term than DFRYF.

Price Growth

DFRYF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FKRAF (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.48% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Home Improvement Chains (+2.73% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFRYF($8.19B) has a higher market cap than FKRAF($1.19B). DFRYF has higher P/E ratio than FKRAF: DFRYF (51.41) vs FKRAF (39.54). DFRYF YTD gains are higher at: 20.183 vs. FKRAF (-5.067). DFRYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.93B vs. FKRAF (124M). DFRYF has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. FKRAF (72.1M). FKRAF has less debt than DFRYF: FKRAF (628M) vs DFRYF (11.7B). DFRYF has higher revenues than FKRAF: DFRYF (14B) vs FKRAF (1.14B).
DFRYFFKRAFDFRYF / FKRAF
Capitalization8.19B1.19B690%
EBITDA2.93B124M2,360%
Gain YTD20.183-5.067-398%
P/E Ratio51.4139.54130%
Revenue14B1.14B1,225%
Total Cash935M72.1M1,297%
Total Debt11.7B628M1,863%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DFRYF vs FKRAF: Fundamental Ratings
DFRYF
FKRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8099
SMR RATING
1..100
9888
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1388
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKRAF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DFRYF (97). This means that FKRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than DFRYF’s over the last 12 months.

DFRYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as FKRAF (99). This means that DFRYF’s stock grew similarly to FKRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FKRAF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as DFRYF (98). This means that FKRAF’s stock grew similarly to DFRYF’s over the last 12 months.

FKRAF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as DFRYF (59). This means that FKRAF’s stock grew similarly to DFRYF’s over the last 12 months.

DFRYF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FKRAF (88). This means that DFRYF’s stock grew significantly faster than FKRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DFRYFFKRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DFRYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FKRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTXL128.803.69
+2.95%
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
XAIX42.490.51
+1.22%
Xtrackers Artfcl Intlgc and Big Dt ETF
SMHX38.490.29
+0.76%
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
GUT6.050.03
+0.50%
Gabelli Utility Trust
BRLN51.530.08
+0.16%
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF

DFRYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DFRYF and ORLY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFRYF and ORLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DFRYF
1D Price
Change %
DFRYF100%
N/A
ORLY - DFRYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
CZASF - DFRYF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKRAF - DFRYF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSITF - DFRYF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - DFRYF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FKRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKRAF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKRAF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKRAF
1D Price
Change %
FKRAF100%
N/A
CMEIF - FKRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - FKRAF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPGNF - FKRAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - FKRAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHCPF - FKRAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More