Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFND vs FTLS
DFND vs FTLS Comparison
Open Charts DFND vs FTLS
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
Price$43.85
Change+$0.30 (+0.69%)
Volume$790
Net Assets8.98M
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$71.76
Change+$0.39 (+0.55%)
Volume$38.56K
Net Assets2.17B
DFND vs FTLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFND vs. FTLS commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFND is a Buy and FTLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTLS has more net assets: 2.17B vs. DFND (8.98M). DFND has a higher annual dividend yield than FTLS: DFND (11.850) vs FTLS (9.943). DFND was incepted earlier than FTLS: DFND (10 years) vs FTLS (11 years). FTLS (1.38) has a lower expense ratio than DFND (1.75). FTLS has a higher turnover DFND (115.00) vs DFND (115.00).
| DFND | FTLS | DFND / FTLS | |
| Gain YTD | 11.850 | 9.943 | 119% |
| Net Assets | 8.98M | 2.17B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.38 | 127% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 235.00 | 49% |
| Yield | 0.95 | 1.17 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFND | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DFND and PWR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFND and PWR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFND | 100% | N/A | ||
| PWR - DFND | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| RMD - DFND | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| NVDA - DFND | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ADI - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| AMAT - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||
FTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTLS has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTLS jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLS | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| SEIC - FTLS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| AXP - FTLS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| MS - FTLS | 72% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| GS - FTLS | 72% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SF - FTLS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||