Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFND vs FFLS
DFND vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts DFND vs FFLS
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
Price$42.95
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$3.48K
Net Assets8.85M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$24.87
Change+$0.21 (+0.85%)
Volume$200
Net Assets39.99M
DFND vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFND vs. FFLS commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFND is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 40M vs. DFND (8.85M). DFND has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: DFND (9.540) vs FFLS (7.107). DFND was incepted earlier than FFLS: DFND (10 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than DFND (1.75). FFLS has a higher turnover DFND (115.00) vs DFND (115.00).
| DFND | FFLS | DFND / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 9.540 | 7.107 | 134% |
| Net Assets | 8.85M | 40M | 22% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.24 | 141% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 313.00 | 37% |
| Yield | 0.96 | 0.16 | 613% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFND | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DFND and ADI have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFND and ADI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFND | 100% | N/A | ||
| ADI - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| PWR - DFND | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| RMD - DFND | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| AMAT - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| KLAC - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| META - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -6.13% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||