Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFND vs FFLS
DFND vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts DFND vs FFLS
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
Price$43.91
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Volume$279
Net Assets9.04M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$24.71
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$3.5K
Net Assets40.37M
DFND vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFND vs. FFLS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFND is a Hold and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 40.4M vs. DFND (9.04M). DFND has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: DFND (12.003) vs FFLS (7.469). DFND was incepted earlier than FFLS: DFND (10 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than DFND (1.75). FFLS has a higher turnover DFND (115.00) vs DFND (115.00).
| DFND | FFLS | DFND / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.003 | 7.469 | 161% |
| Net Assets | 9.04M | 40.4M | 22% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.24 | 141% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 313.00 | 37% |
| Yield | 0.95 | 0.16 | 601% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFND | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DFND and RMD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFND and RMD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFND | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| RMD - DFND | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| PWR - DFND | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| NVDA - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| ADI - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | +3.44% | ||
| AMAT - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||