Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs RSQCX
DFFVX vs RSQCX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs RSQCX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$34.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.39B
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult
Price$13.45
Change+$0.05 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets508.83M
DFFVX vs RSQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. RSQCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and RSQCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. RSQCX (509M). RSQCX (1.70) and DFFVX (1.63) have matching dividends . DFFVX was incepted earlier than RSQCX: DFFVX (25 years) vs RSQCX (22 years). RSQCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). DFFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. RSQCX (5.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSQCX: DFFVX (0) vs RSQCX (2000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. RSQCX (-9.27). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 116.56 vs. RSQCX (-2.82).
| DFFVX | RSQCX | DFFVX / RSQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 2.24 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.35 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.331 | -2.395 | -97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 509M | 2,633% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.70 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | -9.27 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.51 | -9.05 | -414% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.56 | -2.82 | -4,141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.84 | -33.90 | -185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement