Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs QBNAX
DFFVX vs QBNAX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs QBNAX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$36.79
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.92B
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl
Price$36.84
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.97B
DFFVX vs QBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. QBNAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and QBNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. QBNAX (2.97B). DFFVX pays higher dividends than QBNAX: DFFVX (1.50) vs QBNAX (1.01). DFFVX was incepted earlier than QBNAX: DFFVX (26 years) vs QBNAX (33 years). QBNAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). QBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than QBNAX: DFFVX (0) vs QBNAX (1000000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. QBNAX (7.82). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 105.61 vs. QBNAX (65.26).
| DFFVX | QBNAX | DFFVX / QBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.06 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.20 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.027 | 7.909 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 2.97B | 469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.01 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 7.82 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.17 | 30.63 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.61 | 65.26 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.26 | 50.47 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement