Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs QBNAX
DFFVX vs QBNAX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs QBNAX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$37.89
Change-$0.30 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.17B
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl
Price$37.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.68M
DFFVX vs QBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. QBNAX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a StrongBuy and QBNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 14.2B vs. QBNAX (95.7M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than QBNAX: DFFVX (1.65) vs QBNAX (1.02). DFFVX was incepted earlier than QBNAX: DFFVX (26 years) vs QBNAX (33 years). QBNAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). QBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than QBNAX: DFFVX (0) vs QBNAX (1000000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.73 vs. QBNAX (0.89). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 74.19 vs. QBNAX (40.64).
| DFFVX | QBNAX | DFFVX / QBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.06 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.20 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.704 | 10.721 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 95.7M | 14,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.02 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.73 | 0.89 | 641% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.05 | 22.98 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.19 | 40.64 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.58 | 59.27 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement