Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$34.99
Change-$0.31 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.31B
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$17.23
Change-$0.15 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.5M
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. PSCMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Hold and PSCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. PSCMX (265M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than PSCMX: DFFVX (1.62) vs PSCMX (0.93). DFFVX was incepted earlier than PSCMX: DFFVX (26 years) vs PSCMX (12 years). PSCMX (0.76) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSCMX: DFFVX (0) vs PSCMX (500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.01 vs. PSCMX (0.66). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 91.20 vs. PSCMX (83.18).
| DFFVX | PSCMX | DFFVX / PSCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.76 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.76 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.742 | 1.832 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.3B | 265M | 5,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.93 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.01 | 0.66 | 1,207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.63 | 7.35 | 281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.20 | 83.18 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.57 | 20.03 | 332% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers