Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs LRSQX
DFFVX vs LRSQX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs LRSQX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$40.85
Change+$0.66 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.17B
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$13.33
Change+$0.13 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.03M
DFFVX vs LRSQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. LRSQX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and LRSQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. LRSQX (387M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: DFFVX (1.58) vs LRSQX (0.04). DFFVX was incepted earlier than LRSQX: DFFVX (26 years) vs LRSQX (18 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (10.00). DFFVX (0) and LRSQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.44 vs. LRSQX (-0.56). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 62.65 vs. LRSQX (-9.55).
| DFFVX | LRSQX | DFFVX / LRSQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.56 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.56 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.680 | 6.538 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 387M | 3,928% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.04 | 3,598% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.44 | -0.56 | -3,133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 6.33 | 595% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.65 | -9.55 | -656% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.58 | -26.80 | -528% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement